> From: [my boss] > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 > To: [me] > Subject: FW: question > > Jay, the award program question has arisen again. I know > you are busy with [project x] and [project y] work. Do you > have time to look this over and come by to discuss it? > > > From: Liz > > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 > > To: [A lot of people, including my boss] > > Subject: RE: question > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > We’ll need to get some input from our technical team on > > this one, since it was my understanding that the system > is > > set up so that 2005 awards automatically expire on > December > > 31, 2006 unless the property is a repeat winner in 2006. > > Could someone please look into why the 2005 award winners > > are still displaying award logos on [our].com? > > > > Thanks, > > Liz

I fished through my e-mail archive, and dug this out…

> From: Liz > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 > To: [my boss] > Cc: [me]; [somebody else] > Subject: RE: [xxx] Awards Mystery > > Hi Mike, > > [snip] > > If we were to update the business rule for these > properties, what would the timeline look like for making > the change (see below)? [snip] I realize this isn’t > ideal, but it is urgent that we address the issue because > properties are noticing every time their award logo > disappears from the site. > > The business rules for the 2006 program are: > [xxx] winners with 2005 dates expire on 12/31/07 > [xxx] winners with 2006 dates expire on 12/31/07 > [yyy] winners with 2005 dates expire on 12/31/07 > [yyy] winners with 2006 dates expire on 12/31/07 > Please let me know how you think it would be best to > proceed. > > Thanks, > Liz